idea for new card

[dolphinsays]

after seeing the chicken i really like the idea of a monster that rewards you for being risky.
so i was thinking what if there was an infected that has 5 hp like the chicken but could only be killed with exact damage?
as it is even though the chicken rewards risky exploring its still just one card in many that might just get rpg'd
if we make it so that it must be killed with exact damage then only someone willing to go in with just a knife can kill it.
the obvious drawback being that going in with only 5dmg is suicidal if you dont pull it.
to make it worth the gamble you could make it worth 5-8 decorations

comments, ideas what monster would be appropriate?

[135forte]

In tribute to his weakness to knives, Krauser might do, or maybe have it be Ashley and you get no points if you deal her any damage when you reveal her. I say half the point of the Chicken is to waste weapon you have to Trash on it, much like the Events of old, though.

[dolphinsays]

the point is to make something that you would have to go in with just a single knife to kill.
its a big gamble no matter when you try to go for it cause you will most likely end up taking damage.
a card like this might also make carlos olivera (you know which one im talking about) worth playing.

i dont think ashley would make much sense but it would be hilarious to be rewarded for killing her.

[Tylar_Bandai]

after seeing the chicken i really like the idea of a monster that rewards you for being risky.
so i was thinking what if there was an infected that has 5 hp like the chicken but could only be killed with exact damage?
as it is even though the chicken rewards risky exploring its still just one card in many that might just get rpg'd
if we make it so that it must be killed with exact damage then only someone willing to go in with just a knife can kill it.
the obvious drawback being that going in with only 5dmg is suicidal if you dont pull it.
to make it worth the gamble you could make it worth 5-8 decorations

comments, ideas what monster would be appropriate?

I would say that, if it was just one card, by the time the lowest player would score it, they would be too far behind. This would require exact test to determine, but my gut immediately says that. It's too specific a cir****tance to warrant trying for.

[dolphinsays]

well in my mind it would have 0 damage so its just a gamble no matter what placing your at.
if its killed off early then whoever killed it gets a big advantage (at a large risk since 1 out of 30-40 pretty much means your gonna take damge from something else instead)
if it survives into late game it keeps the randomness of the game going.
say its just this infected and the boss left.
either you go in with a bunch of damage and you cant kill or you go in with a knife and chance getting mauled by the boss.
perhaps it should also cause a shuffle despite not being a boss card