Quote:
Originally Posted by Darkness Impulse
People don't really know what an errata is, all people want is to make a new card. That just wont happen, erratas are for clarification, or because a card was supposed to have a certain effect and because of one word, the effect changed, and isn't what it was supposed to be.
It's pretty irritating when people cry out for erratas. Limit or ban it and stop the whining.
|
An errata is simply a correction.
When a card becomes as dominant in the current meta as Hydro-pump has, it was obviously a mistake to even make the card and, therefore, a correction should be made. An errata for this card could be as small as adding the word "printed". It wouldn't change the effect at all, but it would reduce the number of users and make the card more balanced. It would still be a game finisher. It would just take 1-2 more turns.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeffvalentine
Hydro pump is the new FBG so don't cry and use it as everybody does
|
Get your head out of your butt. He's not crying about anything. He DOES use Hydro-pump. He used it to get himself into the top 4 at the Minnesota Kage a couple weeks ago.
All he's doing is asking what you think will happen to it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BunnySlayer
Quoted for epic lulz and irony.
GG
|
OK, that one actually made me lol. Twice. GG
Quote:
Originally Posted by shikamaru pwns anyone
All I know is there is a 0% chance it will get an errata. Learn what erratas are for : P
|
Erratas are for correcting mistakes. Hydro-pump was a mistake.
With that said, I think they are going to limit it to 1 along with Ino's Tears and possibly a couple other wind cards. They've gotten pretty good at destroying the top deck in the format. Water and Earth will probably be touched too since they don't like leaving a second place strong enough to dominate as soon as the top deck is gone.