Go Back   Naruto - Collectible Card Game > Naruto Collectible Card Game > General Discussion
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 03-24-2006, 02:39 PM
SandNinja22 SandNinja22 is offline
Genin
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 86
I can see many people taking a liking to that card. It's absolutely lethal when used with Kakashi (obviously!).

Kyle, when you talked about "hitting for 11" with Kakashi/Lightning Blade, what did you mean?
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-24-2006, 02:42 PM
nara-shikamaru nara-shikamaru is offline
Jonin
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,030
hes talking about the base cards strength plus the jutsu. most cards only have a 5 so he alone can injure out ninjas in a turn with that card or if...hey if he attacked the village only could he get 4 battle rewards..i doubt it but he would have a total 11, and it takes 5 for outstanding...no it wouldnt work, but do correct me if im wrong
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-24-2006, 02:44 PM
Kakihara Kakihara is offline
Jonin
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 642
Ok, the highest battle rewards you can get are 2 for an outanding victory, a difference of 5 in team powers.......
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-24-2006, 02:49 PM
SandNinja22 SandNinja22 is offline
Genin
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 86
oh, if that's all, then I get it. I thought he was talking about something more complicated. Wouldn't this card be an extreme asset to Kakashi decks? Is there anything that can stand up to it? OH! How about that Jutsu
"Sharingan Eye"? Doesn't it negate a Jutsu being played at the cost of having a Sharingan user on the field?

SO, the Exchange of Jutsu would go something like this in a one on one battle, right?

John's Kakashi vs. Sam's Kakashi
John plays Lightning Blade, paying the appropriate cost.
Sam counters with Sharingan Eye, paying his cost.

(Activation Order) Lightning Blade -> Sharingan
(Resolution Order) Lightning Blade <- Sharingan

So, Lightning blade is negated, and (supposing Sam's Kakashi was stronger) John's Kakashi would take 1 damage, and be turned sideways.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 03-24-2006, 02:50 PM
nara-shikamaru nara-shikamaru is offline
Jonin
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,030
exactomundo
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 03-24-2006, 02:54 PM
Kakihara Kakihara is offline
Jonin
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 642
Wait.....Chidori=Lightning blade WTF
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 03-24-2006, 02:56 PM
nara-shikamaru nara-shikamaru is offline
Jonin
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,030
Yup, even in teh unallowed to be mentioned version they call it the lightning blade because he supposedly stopped a lightning bolt with it, then they give you the real name*this shouldnt be a spoiler if their on ep 30*
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 03-24-2006, 03:18 PM
Kakihara Kakihara is offline
Jonin
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 642
Ah yes, at first it is Raikiri! But I think it would be cool to keep the attack names original japanese, it sounds cooler even to the little kids.....Raikiri!
But if it must be translated I also think lightning edge would sound better...
They should change it to chidori when that is shown in the anime....
I hope this is not a case of they trying to avoid spoining the real name, or ignorence of its true name....
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 03-24-2006, 03:19 PM
nara-shikamaru nara-shikamaru is offline
Jonin
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,030
i do like chidori, cause knowing its ballad of a thousand birds is awesome
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 03-24-2006, 03:21 PM
Kakihara Kakihara is offline
Jonin
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 642
And it sounds better, how can he say "Lightingn blade" its not some mech show.......
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.