Mifune ruling

[Akatsukidude101]

Lol this ruling is like Jinzo vs Skill Drain.....

And it shouldnt be, like many have said, i believe attacker should get it, not who entered play first. I, on some level, can see why this was said, but it really is not good for the game....the only reason i get it is because he "turns his effect on" upon entering play, but only applies in when opposed, which would mean that the first Mifune would be on before the other starts, which would let him negate because he was "on" first.

Its not a good ruling, but i get it.

[spiritomb]

Originally Posted by tcvance

With the wording of mifunes effect he never hits the chain, its a continuous conditional effect. So basically it's always on from the time you play him but only affects your opponent when he is opposed. If that makes sense.

Originally Posted by zbkillaz

yes, continuous effects don't use the chain.

I'm happy to note that I wasn't the one to troll q+a this time around, but this is how I understand all conditional continuous effects to work.

Just thought I'd throw that out there.

Also my whole player base generally agrees with it. Some have not voiced an opinion.

[spiritomb]

Originally Posted by spiritomb

I'm happy to note that I wasn't the one to troll q+a this time around, but this is how I understand all conditional continuous effects to work.

Just thought I'd throw that out there.

Also my whole player base generally agrees with it. Some have not voiced an opinion.

I would also like to point out that I've never trolled q+a.

[tcvance]

Originally Posted by spiritomb

I'm happy to note that I wasn't the one to troll q+a this time around, but this is how I understand all conditional continuous effects to work.

Just thought I'd throw that out there.

Also my whole player base generally agrees with it. Some have not voiced an opinion.

Generally agree with what?

[spiritomb]

Originally Posted by tcvance

Generally agree with what?

…with the two quoted posts. Duh.