Dear Bandai: Erratas

[Shino'sDad]

Originally Posted by Anavel Gato

Nick as I said I was simply stateing that the day after the set becomes legal is an sjc was unrelated to the specific cards in question

Then why even post that in regards to the discussion.

[Anavel Gato]

Originally Posted by Shino'sDad

Then why even post that in regards to the discussion.

There were 2 points I was makeing why madara needed the errata and also the coment about 2 and a half weeks

[allanime01]

Originally Posted by Anavel Gato

There were 2 points I was makeing why madara needed the errata and also the coment about 2 and a half weeks

You make less sense than the Naruto timeline.

[Shikamaru_Of_Hebi #1]

Originally Posted by Shino'sDad

Seeing as the set isn't legal for another 2 and a half weeks, I don't think there is a pressing rush to prod Laughing Man into action just yet.

gg /

[spiritomb]

Originally Posted by chichiokurikuri

Don't forget the other errata his post needs. The first sentence is a question after all.

Auto correct turned that into a period. Thanks Allan imes though

[spiritomb]

Originally Posted by Shino'sDad

But errata on cards that aren't even legal yet, especially clarification errata, are immediate anyways. We Know Madara is supposed to say 'Madara Uchiha' and we Know that Kazekage is suppose to be [EOJ]. Even if they post the errata next week, it will be in place for the date the set becomes legal.

Actually I was talking about that in unlimited we are able to run 6 Kazekage again. I guess the mission to eoj thing should be fixed too.

[Earthbullet]

Originally Posted by spiritomb

Actually I was talking about that in unlimited we are able to run 6 Kazekage again. I guess the mission to eoj thing should be fixed too.

why would it matter if you could run 6 kazekage?

[killerkimimaro]

Originally Posted by Earthbullet

why would it matter if you could run 6 kazekage?

why would u lol

[spiritomb]

Originally Posted by Earthbullet

why would it matter if you could run 6 kazekage?

It didn't matter last time either. A form of of professionalism in this matter is to create consistency in erratas. A better form is not to mess up in the first place. Professionalism creates an environment for new players to want to come.

I'm still waiting for adviser of the sand to be fixed.

I now can only invite new players to the game by asking them to dumb down their English to that of a 3rd grader. If they can't then they shouldn't join.

[tcvance]

Originally Posted by spiritomb

It didn't matter last time either. A form of of professionalism in this matter is to create consistency in erratas. A better form is not to mess up in the first place. Professionalism creates an environment for new players to want to come.

I'm still waiting for adviser of the sand to be fixed.

I now can only invite new players to the game by asking them to dumb down their English to that of a 3rd grader. If they can't: they shouldn't join.

You complain about dumbing down english when this ^^ is how you write??
wtf man