Go Back   Naruto - Collectible Card Game > Naruto Collectible Card Game > General Discussion
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 02-12-2008, 07:20 PM
majinsasuke344 majinsasuke344 is offline
Jonin
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,036
Quote:
Originally Posted by toushin1101 View Post
im sure abou the end of the demon, es kakashi, apw, R&R chidori and ino, shika and cho will be reprinted

and when the other platoons for shika/shakaku and choza/choji come out its gonna be worse then when the ino/inoichi platoon came out
No I'm pretty sure it's just from Path to Dream reprints. So that means no Ino-Shika-Cho. But for sure there will be Chidori, APW, CO, ES, EotD, 8 trigrams, and can't forget about the 4th.

Ms344
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 02-12-2008, 07:39 PM
falldowndrunk falldowndrunk is offline
Jonin
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 410
Quote:
Originally Posted by OneWingedAngel View Post
Banning cards does not cause people to quit. If anything it could keep some people from quitting. Could you imagine anyone playing Yugioh if Raigkei, Pot of Greed, Cyber Stein, Yata, Chaos Emp Dragon, and Black Lut. Soldier were still legal? The game would be unplayable. Naruto is in a good spot right now were we only have one card we're worring about, Gaara (Tragic Name). Should Bandai decide to ban this one card I don't think anyone will get upset.
Yugioh is a different game.Why they put out such broken cards in the first place is beyond me,but they HAD to know they would be too powerful.But I do agree that Naruto is doing fine,even WITH Gaara TN.Eventually cards will probably overpower that effect and there are ways around it,so I don't see a need for the ban.That's just my own opinion,and I do believe that if Gaara hadn't come out then it would be another card that everyone claims is too powerful,like APW or the US formations.
I'm currently concerned about the new tin cards coming out,they look like they could be kinda hard too beat..
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 02-12-2008, 08:10 PM
TheHT TheHT is offline
Jonin
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,197
Quote:
Originally Posted by falldowndrunk View Post
Yugioh is a different game.Why they put out such broken cards in the first place is beyond me,but they HAD to know they would be too powerful.But I do agree that Naruto is doing fine,even WITH Gaara TN.Eventually cards will probably overpower that effect and there are ways around it,so I don't see a need for the ban.That's just my own opinion,and I do believe that if Gaara hadn't come out then it would be another card that everyone claims is too powerful,like APW or the US formations.
I'm currently concerned about the new tin cards coming out,they look like they could be kinda hard too beat..
no one releases cards that are overly broken on purpose. Yugioh released those cards, then realized that they were problems. hence, ban. simple and effective. Yugioh wouldn't have lasted this long were it not for that ban list.

you're right, there is always one other card. there's also a difference between a very good card and a broken one, and Gaara's crossed that line into broken. that's when there's issues.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 02-12-2008, 09:41 PM
toushin1101 toushin1101 is offline
Jonin
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,814
Quote:
Originally Posted by majinsasuke344 View Post
No I'm pretty sure it's just from Path to Dream reprints. So that means no Ino-Shika-Cho. But for sure there will be Chidori, APW, CO, ES, EotD, 8 trigrams, and can't forget about the 4th.

Ms344
hahaha u right about that and i havent heard too much on the new set but i think itll be ok and ill have es all the time,lol
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.