Rogue List Discussion

[Sai'ix Renkai]

Originally Posted by allanime01

.......
Anyways

JI is gone, so thats good. Ino CH is at 1, people can stop QQing so much. Kakashi WV at 1 makes me feel much better, and for the first(?) time ever, a card was put on the rogue list before ever even seeing play. For good reason of course, but ****.

I like the rogue list. Though I don't think people would throw The Sage into their decks to play Hirudora anyway... :rollseyes:

Anyway, WV going to one is good, JI being banned is good, Ino is good. No max 2 cards still. Makes me wonder how the list is gonna change next set.Lol we all know it's Mifune and Mu...

[Big Boy]

Originally Posted by Saitsuofleaves

And if you're doing something so important you can't take the time to actually actively check to see if a topic was made, which would take about 2 minutes of your time, then you shouldn't be on the internet in the first place. Which is likely for the best.

Yeah, if you haven't heard, I'm a pretty big deal now.

[Saitsuofleaves]

Originally Posted by Big Boy

Yeah, if you haven't heard, I'm a pretty big deal now.

I haven't heard, nor do I honestly care.

[Big Boy]

Originally Posted by Saitsuofleaves

I haven't heard, nor do I honestly care.

You poor deprived child

[Tourney master]

i didn't like how WV was limited. i thought to 2 would've been better, because JI, the source of the problem as everyone agreed is banned. so semi-limitting kakashi would've been better. Also about that Fourth hokage....would limiting it to 1 be a good idea? it only lives once unless you keep paying the hefty cost of two lightning cards.

[Shino'sDad]

Originally Posted by Tourney master

i didn't like how WV was limited. i thought to 2 would've been better, because JI, the source of the problem as everyone agreed is banned. so semi-limitting kakashi would've been better. Also about that Fourth hokage....would limiting it to 1 be a good idea? it only lives once unless you keep paying the hefty cost of two lightning cards.

Remember that we still have Pakkun and now Kakashi (Boyhood), which allow us to get Kakashi [Well Versed] out earlier, and in the event of a Kakashi off, he would have a +1/+1 coin meaning that you can block and they'd have to jutsu or their Well Versed gets injured and his effect isn't valid.

[Saitsuofleaves]

Originally Posted by Shino'sDad

Remember that we still have Pakkun and now Kakashi (Boyhood), which allow us to get Kakashi [Well Versed] out earlier, and in the event of a Kakashi off, he would have a +1/+1 coin meaning that you can block and they'd have to jutsu or their Well Versed gets injured and his effect isn't valid.

To which they just chump him off later, pass on Inherit and you weep.

I honestly think he deserved to go to 0 but at the same time he deserved a format to prove himself without the bad influence of JI around.

In any case it will be interesting to see what Kakashi's are played to synergize with Boyhood since Assassinate does not.

[JDragon]

Am I in the wrong thread for mad? Where is the mad? Come on Bandai, I know you're worse than this.