|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
My favorite was when Banthony used karin wrong and won that sjc...after the ruling -_________-
|
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Which Karin? So far all of them have been incredibly straightforward...
|
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Needless to say, Charging Chakra is Not playing a card. I hear that free Chakra in a No hand Water deck every turn is pretty good though. |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Edit: ****, beaten to the punch >.< |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Now that I think of it, a certain user probably would have to have asked that on Q&A, then re-asked asking for more confirmation...#442 |
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
What is Spiritomb?
|
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
Too easy. Next challenge will be worth double.
|
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
funnie thing when i first seen 3rd kazekage i didnt notice he was mission attacker my mine seen it as attacker EOJ lol then i seen ppl talking about errata and stuff i was wtf why does he need an errata then i notice he was mission lol
|
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
In addition to the mistakes on the cards, I find it hilarious that supposedly native-English speaking card creators come up with such bad sentence structure and grammar for so many cards, leading to ambiguous interpretation and not a clear representation of intended effect/mechanic. I've lost count how many times intention doesn't come across well and one has to ask for a clarification, or search the Q&A for explanation. And then it's even worse because the Q&A section is a mess, with contradictory answers to the same questions for many cards, or when two cards have similar wording but actually work differently, simply because the intention was such.
|
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
|
You mean how he only used that against bad players and whenever he played someone knowledgeable he didnt cheat with it?
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|