rule change?

[spiritomb]

I'm sorry to do this but when did the rule change that a ninja that recieves lethal damage to make it possible to use its effect now can't be done.


rule link

ruling link involving wild rage naruto

[Laughing_Man]

Originally Posted by spiritomb

I'm sorry to do this but when did the rule change that a ninja that recieves lethal damage to make it possible to use its effect now can't be done.


rule link

ruling link involving wild rage naruto

I am not understanding the question/statement or what the two links have to do with each other.

[spiritomb]

Originally Posted by Laughing_Man

I am not understanding the question/statement or what the two links have to do with each other.

I worded that well and found a link of my proof. I'm not gonna wait another week. Find someone else to answer the question.

[Laughing_Man]

Originally Posted by spiritomb

I worded that well and found a link of my proof. I'm not gonna wait another week. Find someone else to answer the question.

Your question is not worded well. Clarify your question and what your links have to do with your question.

[spiritomb]

Does this explain better?

[Laughing_Man]

Originally Posted by spiritomb

Does this explain better?

Your link is not working.

[spiritomb]

Originally Posted by Laughing_Man

Your link is not working.

How about…


…this?

I took out the red coloring.

Or this→ [url]http://www.bandai.com/naruto/showthread.php?goto=newpost&t=100015[/url]

[spiritomb]

please confirm what VSA said in here as his explanation

[url]http://www.bandai.com/naruto/showthread.php?t=100015[/url]

I'm trying to find the post but I can't find it. It was the last time it was mentioned b4 mjm brought it up pages later.

[Laughing_Man]

Originally Posted by spiritomb

please confirm what VSA said in here as his explanation

[url]http://www.bandai.com/naruto/showthread.php?t=100015[/url]

I'm trying to find the post but I can't find it. It was the last time it was mentioned b4 mjm brought it up pages later.

Which post # are you referring to?

[spiritomb]

Ah, found it. Post 42, second half of post. Minus the name calling. If this isn't it, I'm still lost.