the usual

[Earthbullet]

Originally Posted by spiritomb

*shido thanks for the help but a mission is a mission while on the chain or in play so I don't see how that's so.

*jousha that's been a rule since around set 19

*anyone else, I'm tired of having to play word games with laughing man or Tylar. I've had to wait up to seven months for a condemned answer. It gets tiresome to see no growth on there hand. So excuse me if I don't wanna wait a week to be given a vague answer to wait another week.

*Sharingan yes my first language and my only language is English to which I'm confident I understand better than you.

Tl;dr, shido thanks for being the only one trying to help.

I think what hes trying to say and what you seem to ignore is that you can only negate the effect text of cards in play.

[spiritomb]

Originally Posted by Earthbullet

I think what hes trying to say and what you seem to ignore is that you can only negate the effect text of cards in play.

I could understand that. I asked for proof of that ruling. I'm a man who likes to know the why to everything. Otherwise the ruling looks shoddy and quickly written to supply some sort of answer that they've never thought would be asked.

[kunoalpha]

After reading Kiba It doesn't say that you can't Chain his ability to a counter mission and negate it, his wording is similar to great naruto bridge, but I'll have to look at other rulings to make sure, if I find anything I'll post it here.

Edit: Still Haven't found the GNBridge ruling, waiting for the search engine's cooldown to be done.

[Earthbullet]

Originally Posted by kunoalpha

After reading Kiba It doesn't say that you can't Chain his ability to a counter mission and negate it, his wording is similar to great naruto bridge, but I'll have to look at other rulings to make sure, if I find anything I'll post it here.

Edit: Still Haven't found the GNBridge ruling, waiting for the search engine's cooldown to be done.

you mean beside the fact that he needs to target a perm mission?

[kunoalpha]

Originally Posted by Earthbullet

you mean beside the fact that he needs to target a perm mission?

This is why english is my second language, that effect text went right over my head.

[Earthbullet]

Originally Posted by spiritomb

I could understand that. I asked for proof of that ruling. I'm a man who likes to know the why to everything. Otherwise the ruling looks shoddy and quickly written to supply some sort of answer that they've never thought would be asked.

it could be a new ruling since as far as I know an effect like that hasnt been around before.

[VSA]

Originally Posted by spiritomb

I have more important stuff to do than wait another week. So aside from 60% of the community spamming this with hate, I'm hoping for some resolution even if unofficial. So I ask the community to guide me.inb4lok

here


and here

Actually the second one is easy to answer.

If a ninja effect goes on the chain, but the ninja itself is removed from play before the effect resolves, it will not resolve as the ninja isn't in play anymore. Take any activated ninja ability for instance, say...4th [Supremacy]. If you put him into play via his effect (discard 2 cards) and he comes down, then he gets killed with something like Dragon Flame Jutsu, his injury ability won't resolve, as he isn't in play for it to resolve anymore. So when that Naruto takes lethal damage it's effect won't go off cause the effect goes on the chain, he dies, and it doesn't resolve as he is not in play anymore.

On this first, you're just an idiot. A mission gets coins when it resolves, not before.

PS. You aren't above the system, and the ruling forums answers are law, get off your high horse.

[Shino'sDad]

Originally Posted by VSA

Actually the second one is easy to answer.

If a ninja effect goes on the chain, but the ninja itself is removed from play before the effect resolves, it will not resolve as the ninja isn't in play anymore. Take any activated ninja ability for instance, say...4th [Supremacy]. If you put him into play via his effect (discard 2 cards) and he comes down, then he gets killed with something like Dragon Flame Jutsu, his injury ability won't resolve, as he isn't in play for it to resolve anymore. So when that Naruto takes lethal damage it's effect won't go off cause the effect goes on the chain, he dies, and it doesn't resolve as he is not in play anymore.

On this first, you're just an idiot. A mission gets coins when it resolves, not before.

PS. You aren't above the system, and the ruling forums answers are law, get off your high horse.

All correct.

Interestingly enough, yes, the rules used to be slightly different, but it was no where very recently. Back when Ninja effects did not use the chain, effects such as that Naruto would have gone off even if he died. Keep in mind that these were the times when if you growthed an injured Naruto [Legacy of the Fourth Hokage], you got to draw a card, even though he isn't Valid. Point is, the game evolves and changes for the better over time. I cannot even begin to explain to you the horrors of Magic: The Gathering before Sixth Edition.

[kunoalpha]

Originally Posted by Shino'sDad

All correct.

Interestingly enough, yes, the rules used to be slightly different, but it was no where very recently. Back when Ninja effects did not use the chain, effects such as that Naruto would have gone off even if he died. Keep in mind that these were the times when if you growthed an injured Naruto [Legacy of the Fourth Hokage], you got to draw a card, even though he isn't Valid. Point is, the game evolves and changes for the better over time. I cannot even begin to explain to you the horrors of Magic: The Gathering before Sixth Edition.

Anti Black Lotus' for days.

[spiritomb]

Originally Posted by VSA

Actually the second one is easy to answer.

If a ninja effect goes on the chain, but the ninja itself is removed from play before the effect resolves, it will not resolve as the ninja isn't in play anymore. Take any activated ninja ability for instance, say...4th [Supremacy]. If you put him into play via his effect (discard 2 cards) and he comes down, then he gets killed with something like Dragon Flame Jutsu, his injury ability won't resolve, as he isn't in play for it to resolve anymore. So when that Naruto takes lethal damage it's effect won't go off cause the effect goes on the chain, he dies, and it doesn't resolve as he is not in play anymore.

On this first, you're just an idiot. A mission gets coins when it resolves, not before.

PS. You aren't above the system, and the ruling forums answers are law, get off your high horse.

What makes you think I'm asking about the coins? I'm not asking about the coins.

Also what if an injured valid ninja dies as the result of a showdown. Its effect was to discard the top 2 cards of your opponents deck whenever it received any damage? By your logic it wouldn't work. And yet that is an exception to the rule.