|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
No one is going to play this deck anymore.
|
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Anyone with half of a brain will now just let you resolve the ji and then negate it
|
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'm still confused. I thought that whenever you cannot fulfill the "negate" part of negate and discard, the effect fails altogether. Or is that just the ruling with tetragram?
|
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
that only applys to jutsu lol
|
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
alright kool
|
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
The errata would sadden me but in my build I don't run mission negation.
![]() |
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
but you can still flashpoint, training in the rain(to put out another big drop to make up for losing the 1st one), savior, and the like. i do think its great that if i let the mission resolve then get rid of it, it takes the ninja no matter what now.
unnecessary errata that i like. |
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
And why do you think that?
|
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
I dont think JI was hurt that badly by this......this basically only stops pakkun
|
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
you know, all that mission negate? ![]() (for the record, the errata does not "stop" them, it basically means now if you negate JI, the ninja that was put in play with it now gets discarded too, no matter what) I think some people will still run a couple to do stuff like flashpoint Sasori, WV Kakashi, or Kabutoolbox, but for the most part that deck won't see nearly as much play with pakkun in nearly every sideboard. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|