Go Back   Naruto - Collectible Card Game > Naruto Collectible Card Game > Block Discussion
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 12-19-2012, 09:36 AM
Seiko Seiko is offline
Jonin
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 307
srry marudo. your still a good judge.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 12-19-2012, 12:26 PM
MJM MJM is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 7,595
Shino'sDad has told me of several rulings. I'd have to look through for the exact ones, but I do recall something about Dragon Flame vs Four Tails. I'm not calling anyone a bad judge, I'm just saying I've heard about bad rulings given.

Also, Water is up.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 12-19-2012, 02:08 PM
Shino'sDad Shino'sDad is offline
Jonin
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 7,349
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dalegna View Post
Thanks for calling me a bad judge since im the only judge in MASS *******s i kno my rulings lol
Quote:
Originally Posted by zbkillaz View Post
what are these "accounts?"

*pulls up chair and starts the popcorn
Quote:
Originally Posted by Genre View Post
MJM, what rulings? Mardo was right on every ruling he's given. He is a great judge.
Four Tails, and whatever else Alex as asked me numerous times about over Skype.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 12-19-2012, 03:33 PM
WizKid WizKid is offline
Jonin
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,477
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shino'sDad View Post
Fouar Tails, and whatever else Alex as asked me numerous times about over Skype.
Mind explaining how it interacts with dragon flame then? Im also wondering was there an errata to the card?
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 12-19-2012, 03:40 PM
Shino'sDad Shino'sDad is offline
Jonin
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 7,349
Quote:
Originally Posted by WizKid View Post
Mind explaining how it interacts with dragon flame then? Im also wondering was there an errata to the card?
Four Tails got an errata because it used an errant 'would' which is usually attributed to a replacement effect, but didn't have the 'instead' that verifies such a thing. The 'would' was dropped from both effects, making it an optional triggered effect, which is always was to begin with.

I was told that the perceived ruling was that Four Tails would trigger in response to Dragon Flame just being played on a Tailed Beast, even though the damage had not even been applied yet. A card cannot anticipate an action in the game, as the damage isn't even possibly happening due to other factors such as the jutsu being negated and such.

As Four Tails is now, his effect is a triggered effect, which means his second effect is very fragile, as he is neither Valid, nor would that effect successfully resolve if he was the one removed from play.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 12-19-2012, 04:42 PM
OC_Powers OC_Powers is offline
Jonin
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 830
I liked Shino'sDad's Earth article, cant wait for wind and fire!
(Also, all 3 happen to be my current play elements.)
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 12-19-2012, 05:54 PM
world of pein world of pein is offline
Jonin
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,511
Quote:
Originally Posted by OC_Powers View Post
I liked Shino'sDad's Earth article, cant wait for wind and fire!
(Also, all 3 happen to be my current play elements.)
No pun intended?
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 12-19-2012, 06:34 PM
WizKid WizKid is offline
Jonin
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,477
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shino'sDad View Post
Four Tails got an errata because it used an errant 'would' which is usually attributed to a replacement effect, but didn't have the 'instead' that verifies such a thing. The 'would' was dropped from both effects, making it an optional triggered effect, which is always was to begin with.

I was told that the perceived ruling was that Four Tails would trigger in response to Dragon Flame just being played on a Tailed Beast, even though the damage had not even been applied yet. A card cannot anticipate an action in the game, as the damage isn't even possibly happening due to other factors such as the jutsu being negated and such.

As Four Tails is now, his effect is a triggered effect, which means his second effect is very fragile, as he is neither Valid, nor would that effect successfully resolve if he was the one removed from play.
Thank you. To be honest I can back up mardo on his original ruling that we understood from before the errata, but we did come to the same conclusion you explained after the errata.

Thanks nick.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 12-21-2012, 12:00 PM
MJM MJM is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 7,595
Quote:
Originally Posted by world of pein View Post
That's just an unfortunate coincidence.

Lightning is up.
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 12-22-2012, 05:01 PM
NextoftheLegacy NextoftheLegacy is offline
Jonin
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 413
Re: Fire Comp Strengths

Obito can be used twice even if he's already injured. There's no dependency ("in that case") so "do as much as you can" makes him injure an opposing ninja. You don't need Karin or anything.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:42 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.