Originally Posted by zbkillaz
I said the have the same properties. If people's rebuttal is hidan hasn't won or hidan still is fine even after all of his free benefits excuse me 1 BR benefits then that's fine I can respect that. I think it just means we have a different view of exactly how much one card should be able to do which is fine.
tree summoning din't make my list because it requires set up, and it's something that I've personally haven't lost to in a long time, so long as there's no ino there to support the deck and give it massive plus one I don't think revitalize players will have such an easy time getting their end game shenanigans.
Honestly the only reason Im defending keeping hidan at 3 is because I have never had a problem with the card...thats really my only defense, however regarding ino/tree summoning, limiting ino to 1 wouldnt hurt the deck to bad...yeah it makes it a lot harder for them to get cards to their hand but they still have naruto and eagle to the job just as well if not better. I guess dropping tree would just kill the deck, but to be fair the deck is op, it just wins on turn 6.