Haku Ruling?

[spiritomb]

Originally Posted by MJM

/)_-

It is not a token, it is a Ninja. Also, there was no name calling involved, I said you were being stupid. So again, stop being stupid.

It can be represented by a token but it is not a token, coin, etc. Cards that affect coins, tokens (if they existed), etc. would not affect the Ninja so calling it a coin or token is incorrect.

It would be a ninja symbolized by a token.

Another way to look at this is that infuriation Choji was unofficially errataed to not eat tokens. Technically there is no tokens. But that doesn't mean the idea behind my statement is any less wrong.

[MJM]

Originally Posted by spiritomb

It would be a ninja symbolized by a token.

Another way to look at this is that infuriation Choji was unofficially errataed to not eat tokens. Technically there is no tokens. But that doesn't mean the idea behind my statement is any less wrong.

No, it is still a Ninja. The game recognizes it as a Ninja, not a coin or token*. If they recognized it as a coin or token*, it could be affected by effects that affect coins or tokens*.

Choji specifically says "coins", not "tokens". Again, for what seems like the hundredth time, there are no such things as tokens in this game. With your logic, if you use a die to represent the Ninja, it is a die.

*If they existed.

[spiritomb]

Originally Posted by jousha

Quoting (and bolding) in agreement:



The fact that the copy is represented by a coin or, dare I say it, token doesn't mean it gets around the rules for Reinforcement ninjas.

OK, you can now get into this pointless token vs. coin debate.

But ur not playing a reinforcementninja, you are putting into play the reinforcement. The difference of play vs put into play was covered in my Danzo's seal vs flashpoint q+a question.

[MJM]

Originally Posted by spiritomb

But ur not playing a reinforcementninja, you are putting into play the reinforcement. The difference of play vs put into play was covered in my Danzo's seal vs flashpoint q+a question.

Here we go...

[Shino'sDad]

No, Unsubscribe. I'm Not Doing This.

[spiritomb]

Originally Posted by MJM

No, it is still a Ninja. The game recognizes it as a Ninja, not a coin or token*. If they recognized it as a coin or token*, it could be affected by effects that affect coins or tokens*.

Choji specifically says "coins", not "tokens". Again, for what seems like the hundredth time, there are no such things as tokens in this game. With your logic, if you use a die to represent the Ninja, it is a die.

*If they existed.

Via Merriam Webster online:

2 a : SYMBOL, EMBLEM <a white flag is a token of surrender> b : an instance of a linguistic expression


Maybe you should learn the definition of "token". If Haku puts into play a copy of a ninja, it is a token no matter what other cards may reference it as.

[Earthbullet]

Originally Posted by spiritomb

Via Merriam Webster online:

2 a : SYMBOL, EMBLEM <a white flag is a token of surrender> b : an instance of a linguistic expression


Maybe you should learn the definition of "token. If Haku puts into play a copy of a ninja, it is a token no matter what other cards may reference it as.

Tokens don't exist in naruto ccg game terms also that is a horrible definition

[MJM]

Originally Posted by spiritomb

Via Merriam Webster online:

2 a : SYMBOL, EMBLEM <a white flag is a token of surrender> b : an instance of a linguistic expression


Maybe you should learn the definition of "token. If Haku puts into play a copy of a ninja, it is a token no matter what other cards may reference it as.

au·tism [aw-tiz-uh m]
noun
2. a tendency to view life in terms of one's own needs and desires.

So according to the dictionary, you don't have to be medically diagnosed with it to be autistic.

[spiritomb]

Originally Posted by MJM

au·tism [aw-tiz-uh m]
noun
2. a tendency to view life in terms of one's own needs and desires.

So according to the dictionary, you don't have to be medically diagnosed with it to be autistic.

I challenge your continued name calling and raise you another more accurate definition. I do admit the last definition felt like lm wrote it.

From Google:
to·ken /ˈtōkən/

Noun A thing serving as a visible or tangible representation of something abstract.

[MJM]

Originally Posted by spiritomb

I challenge your continued name calling and raise you another more accurate definition. I do admit the last definition felt like lm wrote it.

From Google:
to·ken /ˈtōkən/

Noun A thing serving as a visible or tangible representation of something abstract.

Do you not understand the basic card game concept I'm feeding you? There are no such things as tokens in the Naruto CCG. Your logic means that Choji (pre-errata) could have removed the Ninja from play. Webster can't help you, you're making yourself look like a fool.