What Do YOU Want to See on Mull to Four?

[Shino'sDad]

Originally Posted by VSA

I wanna see Scott Dashy write tournament reports in the same style he writes Facebook posts on Mull to Four.

DO IT, BETCHUWONT

I would like that as well.

[VSA]

Originally Posted by Shino'sDad

I would like that as well.

I want his pregame prep as well, I'm sure he tests vigorously for each and every event he goes too. No shady events for him before the jumps, obviously.

[Seventh Path]

I personally think you should do Deck Fixes. Like either take decks submitted to you guys or interesting decks you find on the forums and explain what they could do to be better.

I realize MJM has already undertaken this very thing before with brilliant results (Not sarcasm. It was hilarious), but if it were legit this time then it could only benefit the community.

Shino's Dad could also do thing where he discussed why cards were ruled a certain way. It would give not only a point of reference but also prevent people from spamming our forums with the same Q&A questions for a month. I feel itd also prevent the hilarity of how NOBODY knows rulings like the Double Head Wolf/ Kibamaru squad debacle.

[MJM]

I'm very glad we've gotten so much feedback and I must thank you all for that first and foremost. I can definitely foresee "how-to" articles along with many of the things mentioned by rockleeac. As for sticking to the game and not the players, I will tell you right now we are not going to do that; we will have as much fun with it as we can, that's one of the main reasons the blog was created, in addition to benefiting the community of course.

Rogue List predictions are a must however I have little to no interest in Unlimited so we might have to recruit someone that is zealous about the format. Deck fixes never end well, and that's the truth. The Naruto CCG, being as small as it is, has two types of players: the ones that can build a good deck and the ones that cannot. The reason the latter cannot build a deck is because they don't understand the concepts of deck building. There's no point in someone sending us a deck, us fixing it up, and then them not understanding the changes. It'd be better to teach these concepts rather than do it for them.

Again, thank you all for the responses. Mull to Four, as noted before, is not going to be composed of completely serious articles; we'll have fun with it. You cannot blame us for laughing at the community's faults, especially when you do it too. Mull to Four is more of a casual blog than a professional blog; the content will be accurate and reliable however it will not be presented in a boring format.

[MJM]

Also, check out our new article.

[Sunnny_Day]

very cool. something new to check and read nowadays. i was a bit saddened when the 'TPC' crew all retired from their writing.

i've got no suggestions at the moment, but awesome and keep it going.

[skills of an ocular kind]

I love that you guys put up something about deck building, something that players need to know more about. However, I noticed when reading that the whole article is pretty vague. You don't go into much detail about anything. I felt your layout needed examples or some sort of visually aid. Maybe putting an actually deck together while going thrugh the steps would be a stronger approach. Like making a revitalize deck starting with tree summoning explaining that that card is how you plan to win.Then, showing some of the decks staples explaining how those are the support you would use in order to get and use tree summining to win.

[Shino'sDad]

Originally Posted by skills of an ocular kind

I love that you guys put up something about deck building, something that players need to know more about. However, I noticed when reading that the whole article is pretty vague. You don't go into much detail about anything. I felt your layout needed examples or some sort of visually aid. Maybe putting an actually deck together while going thrugh the steps would be a stronger approach. Like making a revitalize deck starting with tree summoning explaining that that card is how you plan to win.Then, showing some of the decks staples explaining how those are the support you would use in order to get and use tree summining to win.

Think of the article as "This is how deck articles in the future are going to be laid out".

[MJM]

So we put up an exclusive preview today. Tomorrow there will be an extensive deck review for you guys and maybe even a special treat. Thanks for all the support so far.

[kunoalpha]

Originally Posted by MJM

So we put up an exclusive preview today. Tomorrow there will be an extensive deck review for you guys and maybe even a special treat. Thanks for all the support so far.

looks more of a sideboard jutsu than a main deck, the only real deck it starts messing with is if someone trys to build weapon this format, most of there jutsu are a specific cost and 1 or a cost of 2 and this can shoot all of those down, I do like a one chakra negation, but it can't stab the big uncommon of the format backstab which is probably one of the best early game jutsu's we've ever gotten and gives you an extreme advantage if you went first.