|
#41
|
|||
|
|||
|
AnyOne wanna buy an iPod?
|
|
#42
|
|||
|
|||
|
It's not a PS3. Kudos on dropping the ball.
|
|
#43
|
|||
|
|||
|
I hope u r joking.
|
|
#44
|
|||
|
|||
|
I find it funny that people were bad mouthing the colorado jump but this jump did not get to many more players then colorado
|
|
#45
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
This SJC was not an event to brag about so ur right it was not much better than Colorado however it would have had an extra 6+ people if I was allowed to play.... Even though that may have not change much besides the pairings and some top 8 slots.Last edited by General StarFox : 11-18-2012 at 12:49 AM. |
|
#46
|
|||
|
|||
|
The difference between Colorado and this Jump was that this Jump had far better players in attendance.
|
|
#47
|
|||
|
|||
|
this^.....
|
|
#48
|
|||
|
|||
|
I bet colorado's next jump (if they get one) will have more then a few people.....but most of them will go out to lunch and will get disqualified for taking to long.
|
|
#49
|
|||
|
|||
|
True but having less than 25 people meant less work and once you won ur 1st 3 games u pretty much made top. Now the top 8 were really the hardest matches of the day overall since once u lose it's over. Hopefully next event can maintain 20+ people because if not than there would be no point having these SJC's.
|
|
#50
|
|||
|
|||
|
Next time they may not even have enough people for a top 8 lol
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|