Go Back   Naruto - Collectible Card Game > Naruto Collectible Card Game > General Discussion
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old 11-17-2012, 09:17 PM
kyuubi rasengan kyuubi rasengan is offline
Jonin
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,062
AnyOne wanna buy an iPod?
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 11-17-2012, 09:19 PM
Shino'sDad Shino'sDad is offline
Jonin
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 7,358
Quote:
Originally Posted by kyuubi rasengan View Post
AnyOne wanna buy an iPod?
It's not a PS3. Kudos on dropping the ball.
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 11-17-2012, 11:20 PM
spiritomb spiritomb is offline
Jonin
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,346
Quote:
Originally Posted by braxtoningrahm View Post
Bandai, why do you give Fire everything it needs to win in every set ever?
I hope u r joking.
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 11-18-2012, 12:22 AM
blood-god blood-god is offline
Jonin
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 625
I find it funny that people were bad mouthing the colorado jump but this jump did not get to many more players then colorado
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 11-18-2012, 12:47 AM
General StarFox General StarFox is offline
Jonin
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 969
Quote:
Originally Posted by blood-god View Post
I find it funny that people were bad mouthing the colorado jump but this jump did not get to many more players then colorado
unfortunately it did not get many attendance because it's near it's ending point This SJC was not an event to brag about so ur right it was not much better than Colorado however it would have had an extra 6+ people if I was allowed to play.... Even though that may have not change much besides the pairings and some top 8 slots.

Last edited by General StarFox : 11-18-2012 at 12:49 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 11-18-2012, 04:32 AM
MJM MJM is offline
Super Card List Tracker
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 7,595
The difference between Colorado and this Jump was that this Jump had far better players in attendance.
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 11-18-2012, 06:01 AM
kyuubi rasengan kyuubi rasengan is offline
Jonin
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,062
Quote:
Originally Posted by MJM View Post
The difference between Colorado and this Jump was that this Jump had far better players in attendance.
this^.....
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 11-18-2012, 06:21 AM
skills of an ocular kind skills of an ocular kind is offline
Chunin
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 190
I bet colorado's next jump (if they get one) will have more then a few people.....but most of them will go out to lunch and will get disqualified for taking to long.
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 11-18-2012, 02:40 PM
General StarFox General StarFox is offline
Jonin
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 969
Quote:
Originally Posted by MJM View Post
The difference between Colorado and this Jump was that this Jump had far better players in attendance.
True but having less than 25 people meant less work and once you won ur 1st 3 games u pretty much made top. Now the top 8 were really the hardest matches of the day overall since once u lose it's over. Hopefully next event can maintain 20+ people because if not than there would be no point having these SJC's.
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 11-18-2012, 02:41 PM
General StarFox General StarFox is offline
Jonin
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 969
Quote:
Originally Posted by skills of an ocular kind View Post
I bet colorado's next jump (if they get one) will have more then a few people.....but most of them will go out to lunch and will get disqualified for taking to long.
Next time they may not even have enough people for a top 8 lol
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:14 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.