|
#111
|
|||
|
|||
|
I do still have interest in the game, but I'm just not all that into playing. Also, I would play but there hasn't been any game masters that I feel can run a competent game, and I don't really want to play under any of them. Once the forums has had a slight break from mafia then I may try and start a game up again, but we will have to wait and see. I am still interested in being on the council, if and when it is formed.
|
|
#112
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#113
|
|||
|
|||
|
why not take break and set the first game after the new year to be run by you two. i can agree with that. bozu is crafty, and you know the nitty gritty. I see it being very well done. Also i think the people who run the game, should pick maybe one of there predecessors (in some cases this might actually not be a good idea, but it would promote fair gameplay and actual intellect as nobody wants to pick an idiot lazy bum to run the show).
just a thought. |
|
#114
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Quote:
nah, too risky. sure we could eventually call BS, but it seems like it would cause headaches. no it's better to follow the old let it go to whoever calls it first + only one game going at a time thing. i think so anyway its not that we can't make your idea work, it just seems like more of a hassle than it needs to be, especially for something that's pretty trivial. we haven't had a lack of GM's. that's also why i think people are fed up with the game in the first place. too much politics and rules. adding a relatively useless rule could be more detrimental than helpful, regardless of the intentions behind it. it may almost be better to scrap this council idea and just have a few basic rules <like before. you know, the basic rules> and each GM can add any rules they want for their game people don't like the rules for that game, they don't play in that game. and also, to make people not have to wait forever to play a game in case many opt out because they don't like the rules/the GM, a rule i think we should put in place is that if the game doesn't get rolling by a week <maybe a little less so as not to get people fed up> since recruitment started, then that game is officially dead...that way if someone makes a game with, say, a cap of 30, and they are only at like 15 and its been nearly a week, they either start playing then so not to make the 15 they do have fed up, or quit and let someone else start a game that is hopefully gets rolling easier. and to be fair, the person who just had a dead game can't make the next one Last edited by hahonryuu : 11-05-2010 at 12:13 AM. |
|
#115
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Adding the rule where a person cannot run a game until at least 2-3 games after the last one they ran. |
|
#116
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
but somehow someway you would end up being a rogue haha. like when you were deciding the roles and picking sheets of paper out of a hat or using some RNG...your name would mysteriously end up part of it, and you would be a rogue ![]() |
|
#117
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I need some rehab. =/ |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|