Go Back   Naruto - Collectible Card Game > Naruto Media and FanArt and More > Naruto Forum Games
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #111  
Old 11-04-2010, 11:25 PM
Sharingan_Warrior5693 Sharingan_Warrior5693 is offline
Tracking Ninja
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 5,202
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bozu4u View Post
I don't blame them. Too many people thought they could run the game and it blew up in their face. Im only sticking with it because im the person that suggested we start playing.

You should play in the next game. Its obvious you're still interested.
I do still have interest in the game, but I'm just not all that into playing. Also, I would play but there hasn't been any game masters that I feel can run a competent game, and I don't really want to play under any of them. Once the forums has had a slight break from mafia then I may try and start a game up again, but we will have to wait and see. I am still interested in being on the council, if and when it is formed.
Reply With Quote
  #112  
Old 11-04-2010, 11:47 PM
Bozu4u Bozu4u is offline
Jonin
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,332
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sharingan_Warrior5693 View Post
I do still have interest in the game, but I'm just not all that into playing. Also, I would play but there hasn't been any game masters that I feel can run a competent game, and I don't really want to play under any of them. Once the forums has had a slight break from mafia then I may try and start a game up again, but we will have to wait and see. I am still interested in being on the council, if and when it is formed.
I understand, I've been looking to take part in running a game as well. I need to take a break and im willing to help if you want/need it.
Reply With Quote
  #113  
Old 11-04-2010, 11:55 PM
Jin Jin is offline
Jonin
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,832
why not take break and set the first game after the new year to be run by you two. i can agree with that. bozu is crafty, and you know the nitty gritty. I see it being very well done. Also i think the people who run the game, should pick maybe one of there predecessors (in some cases this might actually not be a good idea, but it would promote fair gameplay and actual intellect as nobody wants to pick an idiot lazy bum to run the show).

just a thought.
Reply With Quote
  #114  
Old 11-04-2010, 11:56 PM
hahonryuu hahonryuu is offline
Jonin
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 7,913
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bozu4u View Post
I understand, I've been looking to take part in running a game as well. I need to take a break and im willing to help if you want/need it.
bet you a dollar that if you ran/helped run a mafia game, somehow, someway...you would end up a rogue

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jin View Post
why not take break and set the first game after the new year to be run by you two. i can agree with that. bozu is crafty, and you know the nitty gritty. I see it being very well done. Also i think the people who run the game, should pick maybe one of there predecessors (in some cases this might actually not be a good idea, but it would promote fair gameplay and actual intellect as nobody wants to pick an idiot lazy bum to run the show).

just a thought.
i can somewhat see that, however there should be some sort of rules for it. like a person cannot be the head GM of a game again until 2 games later <so that, taking bozu and his "best friend" sharingan warrior as examples, he and bozu cant keep picking each other, totally locking anybody else out>...but i suppose a larger group could still pull something like that >_>

nah, too risky. sure we could eventually call BS, but it seems like it would cause headaches. no it's better to follow the old let it go to whoever calls it first + only one game going at a time thing. i think so anyway

its not that we can't make your idea work, it just seems like more of a hassle than it needs to be, especially for something that's pretty trivial. we haven't had a lack of GM's. that's also why i think people are fed up with the game in the first place. too much politics and rules. adding a relatively useless rule could be more detrimental than helpful, regardless of the intentions behind it.

it may almost be better to scrap this council idea and just have a few basic rules <like before. you know, the basic rules> and each GM can add any rules they want for their game

people don't like the rules for that game, they don't play in that game. and also, to make people not have to wait forever to play a game in case many opt out because they don't like the rules/the GM, a rule i think we should put in place is that if the game doesn't get rolling by a week <maybe a little less so as not to get people fed up> since recruitment started, then that game is officially dead...that way if someone makes a game with, say, a cap of 30, and they are only at like 15 and its been nearly a week, they either start playing then so not to make the 15 they do have fed up, or quit and let someone else start a game that is hopefully gets rolling easier. and to be fair, the person who just had a dead game can't make the next one

Last edited by hahonryuu : 11-05-2010 at 12:13 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #115  
Old 11-05-2010, 12:32 AM
Bozu4u Bozu4u is offline
Jonin
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,332
Quote:
Originally Posted by hahonryuu View Post
bet you a dollar that if you ran/helped run a mafia game, somehow, someway...you would end up a rogue
I've thought about using another account in this game, but I just can't. I don't like cheating in a game based on information and intelligence. I feel like im putting my own skill down and you already know I hate being Rogue, so if anything I would rig myself to be a regular ninja.

Quote:
Originally Posted by hahonryuu View Post
i can somewhat see that, however there should be some sort of rules for it. like a person cannot be the head GM of a game again until 2 games later <so that, taking bozu and his "best friend" sharingan warrior as examples, he and bozu cant keep picking each other, totally locking anybody else out>...but i suppose a larger group could still pull something like that >_>

nah, too risky. sure we could eventually call BS, but it seems like it would cause headaches. no it's better to follow the old let it go to whoever calls it first + only one game going at a time thing. i think so anyway

its not that we can't make your idea work, it just seems like more of a hassle than it needs to be, especially for something that's pretty trivial. we haven't had a lack of GM's. that's also why i think people are fed up with the game in the first place. too much politics and rules. adding a relatively useless rule could be more detrimental than helpful, regardless of the intentions behind it.

it may almost be better to scrap this council idea and just have a few basic rules <like before. you know, the basic rules> and each GM can add any rules they want for their game

people don't like the rules for that game, they don't play in that game. and also, to make people not have to wait forever to play a game in case many opt out because they don't like the rules/the GM, a rule i think we should put in place is that if the game doesn't get rolling by a week <maybe a little less so as not to get people fed up> since recruitment started, then that game is officially dead...that way if someone makes a game with, say, a cap of 30, and they are only at like 15 and its been nearly a week, they either start playing then so not to make the 15 they do have fed up, or quit and let someone else start a game that is hopefully gets rolling easier. and to be fair, the person who just had a dead game can't make the next one
I think we should have a thread where people can volunteer to run a game and the people interested in playing can vote on who they would like to run it.

Adding the rule where a person cannot run a game until at least 2-3 games after the last one they ran.
Reply With Quote
  #116  
Old 11-05-2010, 01:25 AM
hahonryuu hahonryuu is offline
Jonin
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 7,913
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bozu4u View Post
I've thought about using another account in this game, but I just can't. I don't like cheating in a game based on information and intelligence. I feel like im putting my own skill down and you already know I hate being Rogue, so if anything I would rig myself to be a regular ninja.



I think we should have a thread where people can volunteer to run a game and the people interested in playing can vote on who they would like to run it.

Adding the rule where a person cannot run a game until at least 2-3 games after the last one they ran.
yeah i know you don't like it

but somehow

someway

you would end up being a rogue haha. like when you were deciding the roles and picking sheets of paper out of a hat or using some RNG...your name would mysteriously end up part of it, and you would be a rogue
Reply With Quote
  #117  
Old 11-05-2010, 02:03 AM
Bozu4u Bozu4u is offline
Jonin
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,332
Quote:
Originally Posted by hahonryuu View Post
yeah i know you don't like it

but somehow

someway

you would end up being a rogue haha. like when you were deciding the roles and picking sheets of paper out of a hat or using some RNG...your name would mysteriously end up part of it, and you would be a rogue
You're right! Im addicted to this game.... ;_;

I need some rehab. =/
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.